Crypto wallet safety · English
Use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request
A human-readable approval checklist for Ethereum wallet prompts that separates a simple transfer from token permissions, contract calls and blind-signing risk.

Translate the prompt before touching approve
A wallet confirmation is the final opportunity to reject a harmful request, yet raw hexadecimal data or vague labels can make the action hard to understand. Stop when the wallet cannot clearly state what will move, which contract will act or how much authority is granted. Return to the authenticated account and compare the intended action with the approval screen rather than trusting the page that launched it.
The Ethereum Foundation's May 2026 clear-signing announcement describes blind signing as a structural weakness and promotes human-readable transaction confirmations. The wallet-approval interpretation card for use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request preserves requesting origin, network, action type, destination, asset, amount, permission scope and displayed warning. Ethereum Foundation supplies dated external evidence; the current authenticated screen supplies account-specific evidence. Adults only: set a money limit and a time limit. Never chase losses.
Name the action type
A native-asset transfer, token transfer, token allowance and arbitrary contract call create different rights and risks. Require the wallet to identify the action in understandable terms or use an independent simulation and documentation path. For “Name the action type,” compare requesting origin with network; date action type beside destination. Keep asset distinct from amount inside the wallet-approval interpretation card.
Do not treat every prompt with an Approve button as a payment. In use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, requesting origin answers one question while action type answers another. Recheck asset through Ethereum Foundation or the authenticated account, and leave amount unresolved when the evidence does not agree.
Match the requesting origin
Compare the browser hostname, wallet connection and authenticated account instruction before reviewing transaction details. A valid contract interaction can still be initiated by a copied or compromised web interface. The wallet-approval interpretation card places destination beside amount, then tests requesting origin against action type. That “Match the requesting origin” sequence preserves the original unit, wording and time.
A wallet popup does not authenticate the page that caused it to appear. Before match the requesting origin, label destination, amount and requesting origin by origin. For use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, ask Ethereum Foundation only about its published scope and use verified support for the account-specific record.
Read destination and asset together
Contract addresses, token contracts and recipient accounts can be different fields within one request. Expand the details and compare every address and amount against the intended operation. For “Read destination and asset together,” compare asset with amount; date permission scope and displayed warning beside requesting origin. Keep network distinct from action type inside the wallet-approval interpretation card.
Do not rely on a shortened label or icon supplied by an unverified interface. In use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, asset answers one question while permission scope and displayed warning answers another. Recheck network through Ethereum Foundation or the authenticated account, and leave action type unresolved when the evidence does not agree.
Limit permission scope
Choose a bounded amount and duration where supported, then inventory and revoke the permission after use. A request may authorize future spending beyond the immediate amount, sometimes without a natural expiry. The wallet-approval interpretation card places requesting origin beside action type, then tests asset against permission scope and displayed warning. That “Limit permission scope” sequence preserves the original unit, wording and time.
Convenience is not a reason to grant unlimited authority to an unexplained spender. Before limit permission scope, label requesting origin, action type and asset by origin. For use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, ask Ethereum Foundation only about its published scope and use verified support for the account-specific record.
Reject unreadable urgency
Scam flows often pair a confusing signature with a timer, support call or claim that account funds will otherwise disappear. Cancel the prompt and re-establish the task from a verified route with no caller controlling the pace. For “Reject unreadable urgency,” compare network with action type; date destination beside asset. Keep amount distinct from permission scope and displayed warning inside the wallet-approval interpretation card.
No legitimate promotion or account check makes an incomprehensible signature safe. In use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, network answers one question while destination answers another. Recheck amount through Ethereum Foundation or the authenticated account, and leave permission scope and displayed warning unresolved when the evidence does not agree.
Use the Foundation announcement for clear-signing purpose
The announcement explains why human-readable intent at approval time matters and how an open clear-signing standard aims to reduce blind approval. For use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, open Ethereum Foundation through HTTPS and compare requesting origin, network and action type with the source date.
It does not guarantee that a particular wallet implements the standard or certify any contract, gaming page or payment request. The wallet-approval interpretation card keeps that boundary beside amount and permission scope and displayed warning; a citation must not be stretched across a different country, product, network or time.
Approve only a transaction you can describe
If the account holder cannot state the network, action, destination, asset, amount and permission scope in plain language, cancellation is the correct outcome. A finished wallet-approval interpretation card connects requesting origin to permission scope and displayed warning, dates the comparison, and makes a safe next action reproducible for the account holder or relevant authority.
SignalBet is for adults 18+ where lawful. Wallet approval is a security decision, never evidence that a wager will win or a loss should be chased. In use clear-signing questions before approving a wallet request, set affordable money and time limits before participation, take breaks, and never borrow or chase losses. Neither network nor amount makes gambling predictable.
Source: Ethereum Foundation ↗
